Introduction:
Â
           Self concept in the central theme around which a large number of the major aspects of personality are organized. Cattel referred self concept as the â??Key-Stone of Personality, Lewin (1951) has pointed out that self concept gives the consistency to personality. Self concept is the bases fro oneâ??s program in oneâ??s life of it is necessary to develop self confidence. In the process of learning from others experiences one must have self concept. It helps a person to compete with others. It makes him accept the failure and success in the same manner because he knows himself well. To build a general conception about others, self Concept is very much needed.
           Strengthening oneâ??s self concept may lead to perform well in his examination. A sense of personal worth should be cultivated through good education.Â
           In this present scenario of the commercial and competitive world, the investigator tries to investigate the self concept of students in different schools in relation to gender.
Â
Self Concept:
           Self concept in a composite of a persons, thoughts and feelings of strivings of hopes and fear and fantasies, his views of what he is what has been. What he might become and his attitudes becoming to his worth.
Gender:
           Feminist dictionary (1985) refers that â??it is often used as a synonym of the sex i.e biological maleness or femaleness. However, it is also used particularly by contemporary writers, to refer to the socially imposed dictionary of masculine and feminine role and character traits.
           Encyclopedia of feminism (1986) refers â??Gender to the Socially imposed decision between the sexes, where as sex refers to the historical, anatomical differences between male and female. Gender refers to the emotional and Psychological attributes which a given culture expects to coincide with physical maleness and femalenessâ?.
Â
Â
Adolescence:
           â??Psychologically, adolescence is the age when the individual becomes integrated into the society of adults the age when the child no longer feels that he is below the level of his elders but equal, at least in rightsâ?¦..This integration into adult society has many affective aspects, more or less linked with pubertyâ?¦â?¦â?¦..It also includes very profound intellectual changesâ?¦â?¦â?¦â?¦..These intellectual transformations, typical of the adolescents, â??thinkingâ? enable his not only to achieve his integration into the social relationship of adults, which is in fact, the most general characteristic of this period of developmentâ?.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Jean Piaget
Â
Objectives:
To find out the of self concept among the students of two different schools.
To find out the self concept of students with special reference to gender.
Hypothesis:Â
There is no significant difference in the self concept between boys and girls of Government and Matriculation school.
There is no significant difference the self concept between boys and girls Government School.â??
The girls of Government and Matriculation school regarding self concept.
There is no significant difference in the self concept between the boys of Government and Matriculation school.
There is no significant difference in the self concept between the students of Matriculation and Government school.
There is no significant difference in the self concept between boys and girls of Matriculation School
Â
Methodology:
           The survey method was used to collect the data. To study the self concept of students, the investigator constructed a tool which was constructed by the investigator.
Â
Â
Sample:
           Adolescent students belonging to Matriculation school and Government School in Palani constitute the population.  Care was taken during the distribution of tool to matriculation and Government school adolescent students in Dindigul area from the two schools, data is collected from 115 students by random sampling method.
Â
Findings and Interpretations:
           Statistical Procedure â??tâ?? test is used to find out the difference in self concept among boys and girls in two different schools.
 Table : 1
           Difference between the mean and standard deviation of Boys and Girls of Government schools regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Boys of Government School
44
184.95
16.88
Girls of Government School
51
185.22
17.94
Â
Table : 2
           Difference between the mean and standard deviation of Boys and Girls of Matriculation schools regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Boys of Matriculation School
18
186.11
11.28
Girls of Matriculation School
21
183.71
16.28
Â
Table : 3
           Difference between the mean and standard deviation of Girls of Government schools and Matriculation schools regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Girls of Government School
51
185.22
17.94
Girls of Matriculation School
21
183.71
16.28
Â
Table : 4
Difference between the mean and standard deviation of Boys of Government schools and Matriculation Schools regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Boys of Government School
44
184.95
17.94
Boys of Matriculation School
18
186.11
11.25
Â
Table : 5
           Difference between the mean and standard deviation of students of Government schools and Matriculation schools regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Students of Government School
95
185.09
17.46
Students of Matriculation School
39
184.85
13.89
Â
Â
Table : 6
Difference between Boys and Girls of Government schools and Matriculation schools.
Â
Groups
N0
Boys of 2 Schools
62
Girls of 2 Schools
72
Â
Â
Â
Self concept of students
Hypotheses:
           There is no significant difference in the self concept between boys and girls of Government and Matriculation school.
Â
Table : 7
           Difference between the mean and standard deviation of Boys and Girls of Government schools regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Ï?D
t
Level of Significance
Boys of Government School
44
184.95
16.88
3.5
0.0754
NS
Girls of Government School
51
185.22
17.94
Â
           The obtained t value is lower than the table value at 0.05 level. Hence the hypothesis there is no significant difference in the self concept between the boys and girls of Government and Matriculation school is accepted.
Â
Hypotheses : 2
           There is no significant difference in the self concept between the boys and girls of Matriculation school.
Table: 8
Difference between the mean and standard deviation of boys and girls of Matriculation regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Ï?D
t
Level of Significance
Boys of Matriculation
18
186.167
11.28
4.44
0.554
NS
Girls of Matriculation
21
183.71
16.28
Â
           From the table value it is inferred that the obtained â??tâ?? value is lower the theoretical value of significance at 0.05 level. Hence the hypotheses â??There is no significant difference in the self concept between boys and girls of Matriculation school is accepted.
Hypotheses: 3
           The girls of Government and Matriculation school do not difference significantly in their self concept.
Â
Table : 9
           Difference between the mean and deviation of girls of Government and Matriculation school regarding self concept.
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Ï?D
t
Level of Significance
Girls of Government
51
185.24
17.94
4.35
0.35
NS
Girls of Matriculation
21
183.71
16.28
Â
           From the table value it is inferred that the obtained â??tâ?? value is lower mean the theoretical value at 0.05 level. Hence the hypothesis â??The girls of Government and matriculation school do not differ significance in their self concept is accepted.
Hypotheses: 4
           There is no significant difference in the self concept between the boys of Government and Matriculation School.
Â
Table : 10
           Difference between the mean and standard decision of boys of government and Matriculation school regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Ï?D
t
Level of Significance
Boys of Government
44
184.95
16.85
3.64
0.335
NS
Boys of Matriculation
18
186.17
11.026
Â
           From the table value it is inferred that the obtained â??tâ?? value is significant at 0.05 level. Hence the hypotheses â??The boys of Government and Matriculation school do not difference significantly is their self concept is accepted.
Â
Hypotheses: 5
           There is no significant in the self concept between the students of Government and Matriculation school.
Table: 11
Â
           Different between the mean and student deviation of students of Government an Matriculation regarding self concept.
Â
Groups
N
M
Ï?
Ï?D
t
Level of Significance
Student of government
95
185.09
17.46
2.86
0.084
NS
Student of Matriculation
39
184.85
13.89
Â
           The hypothesis â??There is no significant difference in the self concept school in acceplied because the obtained â??tâ?? value is less than the theoretical value of significant  at 0.05 level.
           The boys and girls of Government and Matriculation school do not differ the self concept.
           Thus the researcher want to study the self concept of students at secondary level. Who are considered as adolescents of only at this stage. Many concepts are formed in oneâ??s life.Â
           During adolescent stage concepts formal are may be due to the treatment of teachers at school and parented behaviour at home of the students in two schools (ie) Government and Matriculation when the students are alive.
Â
Â
Findings:
There is no difference in the self concept of boys of two schools.
The girls of the two schools do not differ in their self concept.
There is no difference between the students of the 2 schools in their self concept.
There is no difference between the boys and girls of Government school in their self concept.
Boys and girls of Matriculation school do not differ in their self concept.
Recommendations:
     In general, there is no significant difference between boys and girls of secondary
level students in two different schools.
     In order to develop their self concept among girls and boys encouragement,
incentives, rewards should be given to who participate in the adventurous activities in the school.
     The investigation has first of all helped the investigator to gain more knowledge
regarding self concept of the students. This will help an investigator to carry such a study on some other sample. This will help the students to develop their personality as a whole to become worthy citizen of tomorrow.
Reference:
Bell H.M., Edson. K and shaw, M.C. The self concept of bright under achieving high school students are revealed by an adjective check list person. Guid J. 1960, 39(3): 193-196.
Bodwin, R.F, and Bruck,M.  The relationship between self concept and the presence and absence of scholarstic achievement J.Clin, Psychol, 1962,18 (2) 181-182.
Cliam 1987 Chiam .H. 1987 change in self concept during adolescence 22, (69-76)
Cattell, R.B.1957, Personality and Motivation structure and Measurement, New York Harcourt, Brace and World.
Gordon stobart, Jannette Elwood and Michael quinaln. 1992 â?? Gender bias in examinations: British educational Research Journal Vol.18.No.3.
Sponsored by - Pregnancy Books